Is a Bare King or a King-Led Sequence Better for an Empty Column?
A King-led run usually uses an empty column efficiently, but a bare King is better when moving it reveals a hidden card or preserves a needed sequence elsewhere.
A King-led sequence usually extracts more value from an empty column because one move relocates several ordered cards. But length is not decisive. A bare King is better when moving it exposes a hidden card, releases a waste card, or keeps a more important sequence flexible.
Compare the after-position rather than counting cards alone.
When the run is efficient
Suppose K♠–Q♥–J♣ can move into the empty lane and doing so clears its source column. You gain a new ordered column and may create another empty lane immediately. That is a strong use of the space.
The run also preserves internal mobility: 10♦ can later join J♣, and the whole sequence can accept more cards in order.
When the bare King wins
Imagine bare K♦ is the only card above a face-down card, while K♠–Q♥–J♣ lies in a fully open column. Moving K♦ reveals information; moving the long run changes no access. The bare King is the stronger first move.
A waste King can have the same advantage when its removal exposes an Ace or another playable card.
Watch what the run buries
A long King sequence may contain a card needed elsewhere. In K♠–Q♥–J♣–10♦, the open 10♦ can still receive 9♣. But if J♣ is the only black parent available for 10♥, you must first move 10♦ away before J♣ can receive it. More cards moved does not always mean more options retained.
Decide before filling the lane
- Which source column becomes open or reveals a card?
- Does the King-led run remain useful and movable?
- Is a lower card in the run needed as a parent elsewhere?
- What exact next move follows each choice?
Use the comparison in Play Klondike Draw 1 or Play Klondike Draw 3.
Sources used
This guide distinguishes PlaySoli's current game rules from historical variants and marks disputed claims instead of presenting them as settled facts.